Issue-shaped requests
File paths, components, examples, acceptance checks, and a bounded outcome give coding work useful structure.
GPT-5 rewards precise scope, consistent instructions, and deliberate use of reasoning and verbosity controls.
The mental model
“Make the task unambiguous, then tune effort with evals instead of adding prompt folklore.”
Three levels
Do not add production scaffolding before you can describe and measure a good single-task result.
Give the model enough context to act without making it infer the job.
Match intelligence, latency, and response length to the work.
Preserve useful reasoning context and make tool use observable.
Starter template
Replace the bracketed text, run it on a real task, and add guidance only when you can name the failure it fixes.
<task>
[One concrete outcome]
</task>
<context>
[Only the facts, files, or examples needed for this task]
</context>
<constraints>
- [Important boundary]
- [Required source or tool behavior]
</constraints>
<deliverable>
[Format, audience, length, and acceptance criteria]
</deliverable>File paths, components, examples, acceptance checks, and a bounded outcome give coding work useful structure.
Ask the model to diagnose failed outputs and improve the prompt, then verify the revision against an eval set.
A task can require deep reasoning and still need a short final answer; control those dimensions independently.
The model spends effort reconciling incompatible tone, scope, or tool instructions.
Fix: Consolidate instructions and state which rule wins when an exception is intentional.
Routine work becomes slower and more expensive without a measurable quality gain.
Fix: Start with the lowest plausible effort and raise it only when evals show under-thinking.
A large prompt becomes brittle across unrelated tasks and hard to debug.
Fix: Use stable shared context plus smaller task templates with their own success criteria.
Current as of July 26, 2026
OpenAI’s guidance for the GPT-5 series emphasizes baseline evals, clearer and often shorter prompts, reusable templates, and independent controls for reasoning effort and visible verbosity.
Evidence ledger
Official provider documentation takes priority. Maintainer field notes are useful evidence, but they are labeled separately.
OpenAI
Current flagship model identity and supported API capabilities.
OpenAI
Evals, prompt simplification, metaprompting, effort, verbosity, and Responses API guidance.
OpenAI
Issue-shaped tasks, AGENTS.md context, environment improvement, and iterative workflows.
This guide is reviewed at least every 30 days. Automated checks flag unavailable sources and overdue reviews; substantive advice changes require human verification.