Comparison

Claude Code vs goose

How the two compare on the things that decide whether your setup carries over: open standards, license, models and where they run.

Claude Codegoose
MakerAnthropicBlock, now at the Agentic AI Foundation
LicenseProprietaryApache-2.0
ModelsAnthropic Claude modelsMany providers, including local models
Runs inTerminal, IDE, Desktop, WebDesktop, Terminal, API
MCPMCP: supportedMCP: supported
Agent SkillsAgent Skills: supportedAgent Skills: supported
AGENTS.md?AGENTS.md: not yet verifiedAGENTS.md: supported
ACPACP: supportedACP: supported

Key differences

  • goose is open source (Apache-2.0); Claude Code is proprietary. If you need to self-host, audit or fork the harness, that settles it.
  • Models: Claude Code runs Anthropic Claude models; goose runs Many providers, including local models.
  • Claude Code also runs in IDE, Web; goose also runs in API.
  • goose supports AGENTS.md; we have not verified it for Claude Code.
  • Both support MCP, Agent Skills, ACP, so MCP servers, skills and repo instructions you set up carry over if you switch.

In their own words

Claude Code

Anthropic's agentic coding tool. Reads the codebase, edits files, runs commands, and extends through MCP servers, Skills, subagents, hooks and plugin marketplaces. Project instructions live in CLAUDE.md.

goose

Open-source, extensible agent with desktop app, CLI and API. Its extensions are MCP servers. A founding project of the Linux Foundation's Agentic AI Foundation.

FAQ

Is Claude Code or goose open source?
Claude Code is proprietary. goose is open source under Apache-2.0.
Do Claude Code and goose support MCP servers?
Claude Code: yes. goose: yes.
Can I reuse Agent Skills between Claude Code and goose?
Yes. Both read the open Agent Skills (SKILL.md) format, so the same skill folder works in both.

Set up MCP servers in either one

More comparisons

Reviewed Oct 5, 2026.