Comparison
Gemini CLI vs OpenCode
How the two compare on the things that decide whether your setup carries over: open standards, license, models and where they run.
| Gemini CLI | OpenCode | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anomaly (SST) | |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Models | Google Gemini models | 75+ providers, including local models |
| Runs in | Terminal | Terminal, IDE, Desktop |
| MCP | MCP: supported | MCP: supported |
| Agent Skills | Agent Skills: supported | Agent Skills: supported |
| AGENTS.md | AGENTS.md: supported | AGENTS.md: supported |
| ACP | ACP: supported | ACP: supported |
Key differences
- Both are open source (Apache-2.0 and MIT), so you can inspect and self-host either.
- Models: Gemini CLI runs Google Gemini models; OpenCode runs 75+ providers, including local models.
- OpenCode also runs in IDE, Desktop.
- Both support MCP, Agent Skills, AGENTS.md, ACP, so MCP servers, skills and repo instructions you set up carry over if you switch.
In their own words
FAQ
- Is Gemini CLI or OpenCode open source?
- Gemini CLI is open source under Apache-2.0. OpenCode is open source under MIT.
- Do Gemini CLI and OpenCode support MCP servers?
- Gemini CLI: yes. OpenCode: yes.
- Can I reuse Agent Skills between Gemini CLI and OpenCode?
- Yes. Both read the open Agent Skills (SKILL.md) format, so the same skill folder works in both.
Set up MCP servers in either one
More comparisons
Reviewed Oct 5, 2026.