Comparison
Gemini CLI vs Cursor
How the two compare on the things that decide whether your setup carries over: open standards, license, models and where they run.
| Gemini CLI | Cursor | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anysphere | |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary |
| Models | Google Gemini models | See vendor docs |
| Runs in | Terminal | IDE, CLI, Web |
| MCP | MCP: supported | MCP: supported |
| Agent Skills | Agent Skills: supported | Agent Skills: supported |
| AGENTS.md | AGENTS.md: supported | AGENTS.md: supported |
| ACP | ACP: supported | ACP: supported |
Key differences
- Gemini CLI is open source (Apache-2.0); Cursor is proprietary. If you need to self-host, audit or fork the harness, that settles it.
- Gemini CLI also runs in Terminal; Cursor also runs in IDE, CLI, Web.
- Both support MCP, Agent Skills, AGENTS.md, ACP, so MCP servers, skills and repo instructions you set up carry over if you switch.
In their own words
FAQ
- Is Gemini CLI or Cursor open source?
- Gemini CLI is open source under Apache-2.0. Cursor is proprietary.
- Do Gemini CLI and Cursor support MCP servers?
- Gemini CLI: yes. Cursor: yes.
- Can I reuse Agent Skills between Gemini CLI and Cursor?
- Yes. Both read the open Agent Skills (SKILL.md) format, so the same skill folder works in both.
Set up MCP servers in either one
More comparisons
Reviewed Oct 5, 2026.