Comparison

Cursor vs Kiro

How the two compare on the things that decide whether your setup carries over: open standards, license, models and where they run.

CursorKiro
MakerAnysphereAWS
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
ModelsSee vendor docsSee vendor docs
Runs inIDE, CLI, WebIDE, CLI
MCPMCP: supportedMCP: supported
Agent SkillsAgent Skills: supportedAgent Skills: supported
AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md: supported?AGENTS.md: not yet verified
ACPACP: supportedACP: supported

Key differences

  • Both are proprietary products from their vendors.
  • Cursor also runs in Web.
  • Cursor supports AGENTS.md; we have not verified it for Kiro.
  • Both support MCP, Agent Skills, ACP, so MCP servers, skills and repo instructions you set up carry over if you switch.

In their own words

Cursor

AI editor and coding agent. Supports MCP, Agent Skills, AGENTS.md, and runs as both an ACP agent and client.

Kiro

Spec-driven agentic IDE and CLI: turns prompts into requirements, designs and tasks before writing code.

FAQ

Is Cursor or Kiro open source?
Cursor is proprietary. Kiro is proprietary.
Do Cursor and Kiro support MCP servers?
Cursor: yes. Kiro: yes.
Can I reuse Agent Skills between Cursor and Kiro?
Yes. Both read the open Agent Skills (SKILL.md) format, so the same skill folder works in both.

Set up MCP servers in either one

More comparisons

Reviewed Oct 5, 2026.