Comparison
Cursor vs Kiro
How the two compare on the things that decide whether your setup carries over: open standards, license, models and where they run.
| Cursor | Kiro | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anysphere | AWS |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Models | See vendor docs | See vendor docs |
| Runs in | IDE, CLI, Web | IDE, CLI |
| MCP | MCP: supported | MCP: supported |
| Agent Skills | Agent Skills: supported | Agent Skills: supported |
| AGENTS.md | AGENTS.md: supported | ?AGENTS.md: not yet verified |
| ACP | ACP: supported | ACP: supported |
Key differences
- Both are proprietary products from their vendors.
- Cursor also runs in Web.
- Cursor supports AGENTS.md; we have not verified it for Kiro.
- Both support MCP, Agent Skills, ACP, so MCP servers, skills and repo instructions you set up carry over if you switch.
In their own words
FAQ
- Is Cursor or Kiro open source?
- Cursor is proprietary. Kiro is proprietary.
- Do Cursor and Kiro support MCP servers?
- Cursor: yes. Kiro: yes.
- Can I reuse Agent Skills between Cursor and Kiro?
- Yes. Both read the open Agent Skills (SKILL.md) format, so the same skill folder works in both.
Set up MCP servers in either one
More comparisons
Reviewed Oct 5, 2026.