Comparison
Cursor vs OpenClaw
How the two compare on the things that decide whether your setup carries over: open standards, license, models and where they run.
| Cursor | OpenClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anysphere | OpenClaw community |
| License | Proprietary | Open source |
| Models | See vendor docs | See vendor docs |
| Runs in | IDE, CLI, Web | Local, Messaging |
| MCP | MCP: supported | ?MCP: not yet verified |
| Agent Skills | Agent Skills: supported | Agent Skills: supported |
| AGENTS.md | AGENTS.md: supported | ?AGENTS.md: not yet verified |
| ACP | ACP: supported | ACP: supported |
Key differences
- OpenClaw is open source; Cursor is proprietary. If you need to self-host, audit or fork the harness, that settles it.
- Cursor also runs in IDE, CLI, Web; OpenClaw also runs in Local, Messaging.
- Cursor supports MCP; we have not verified it for OpenClaw.
- Cursor supports AGENTS.md; we have not verified it for OpenClaw.
- Both support Agent Skills, ACP, so MCP servers, skills and repo instructions you set up carry over if you switch.
In their own words
FAQ
- Is Cursor or OpenClaw open source?
- Cursor is proprietary. OpenClaw is open source.
- Do Cursor and OpenClaw support MCP servers?
- Cursor: yes. OpenClaw: not verified yet.
- Can I reuse Agent Skills between Cursor and OpenClaw?
- Yes. Both read the open Agent Skills (SKILL.md) format, so the same skill folder works in both.
Set up MCP servers in either one
More comparisons
Reviewed Oct 5, 2026.