Comparison
OpenCode vs Cline
How the two compare on the things that decide whether your setup carries over: open standards, license, models and where they run.
| OpenCode | Cline | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anomaly (SST) | Cline |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Models | 75+ providers, including local models | See vendor docs |
| Runs in | Terminal, IDE, Desktop | IDE, CLI |
| MCP | MCP: supported | MCP: supported |
| Agent Skills | Agent Skills: supported | ?Agent Skills: not yet verified |
| AGENTS.md | AGENTS.md: supported | ?AGENTS.md: not yet verified |
| ACP | ACP: supported | ACP: supported |
Key differences
- Both are open source (MIT and Apache-2.0), so you can inspect and self-host either.
- OpenCode also runs in Terminal, Desktop; Cline also runs in CLI.
- OpenCode supports Agent Skills; we have not verified it for Cline.
- OpenCode supports AGENTS.md; we have not verified it for Cline.
- Both support MCP, ACP, so MCP servers, skills and repo instructions you set up carry over if you switch.
In their own words
FAQ
- Is OpenCode or Cline open source?
- OpenCode is open source under MIT. Cline is open source under Apache-2.0.
- Do OpenCode and Cline support MCP servers?
- OpenCode: yes. Cline: yes.
- Can I reuse Agent Skills between OpenCode and Cline?
- Only if both support the Agent Skills format. Check the table above.
Set up MCP servers in either one
More comparisons
Reviewed Oct 5, 2026.