Comparison

OpenCode vs Kiro

How the two compare on the things that decide whether your setup carries over: open standards, license, models and where they run.

OpenCodeKiro
MakerAnomaly (SST)AWS
LicenseMITProprietary
Models75+ providers, including local modelsSee vendor docs
Runs inTerminal, IDE, DesktopIDE, CLI
MCPMCP: supportedMCP: supported
Agent SkillsAgent Skills: supportedAgent Skills: supported
AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md: supported?AGENTS.md: not yet verified
ACPACP: supportedACP: supported

Key differences

  • OpenCode is open source (MIT); Kiro is proprietary. If you need to self-host, audit or fork the harness, that settles it.
  • OpenCode also runs in Terminal, Desktop; Kiro also runs in CLI.
  • OpenCode supports AGENTS.md; we have not verified it for Kiro.
  • Both support MCP, Agent Skills, ACP, so MCP servers, skills and repo instructions you set up carry over if you switch.

In their own words

OpenCode

Provider-agnostic open-source coding agent for terminal, IDE and desktop. Works with 75+ model providers, including local models.

Kiro

Spec-driven agentic IDE and CLI: turns prompts into requirements, designs and tasks before writing code.

FAQ

Is OpenCode or Kiro open source?
OpenCode is open source under MIT. Kiro is proprietary.
Do OpenCode and Kiro support MCP servers?
OpenCode: yes. Kiro: yes.
Can I reuse Agent Skills between OpenCode and Kiro?
Yes. Both read the open Agent Skills (SKILL.md) format, so the same skill folder works in both.

Set up MCP servers in either one

More comparisons

Reviewed Oct 5, 2026.