Comparison
OpenCode vs goose
How the two compare on the things that decide whether your setup carries over: open standards, license, models and where they run.
| OpenCode | goose | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anomaly (SST) | Block, now at the Agentic AI Foundation |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Models | 75+ providers, including local models | Many providers, including local models |
| Runs in | Terminal, IDE, Desktop | Desktop, Terminal, API |
| MCP | MCP: supported | MCP: supported |
| Agent Skills | Agent Skills: supported | Agent Skills: supported |
| AGENTS.md | AGENTS.md: supported | AGENTS.md: supported |
| ACP | ACP: supported | ACP: supported |
Key differences
- Both are open source (MIT and Apache-2.0), so you can inspect and self-host either.
- Models: OpenCode runs 75+ providers, including local models; goose runs Many providers, including local models.
- OpenCode also runs in IDE; goose also runs in API.
- Both support MCP, Agent Skills, AGENTS.md, ACP, so MCP servers, skills and repo instructions you set up carry over if you switch.
In their own words
OpenCode
Provider-agnostic open-source coding agent for terminal, IDE and desktop. Works with 75+ model providers, including local models.
FAQ
- Is OpenCode or goose open source?
- OpenCode is open source under MIT. goose is open source under Apache-2.0.
- Do OpenCode and goose support MCP servers?
- OpenCode: yes. goose: yes.
- Can I reuse Agent Skills between OpenCode and goose?
- Yes. Both read the open Agent Skills (SKILL.md) format, so the same skill folder works in both.
Set up MCP servers in either one
More comparisons
Reviewed Oct 5, 2026.